Writer questions Dakota Energy policies
This item is available in full to subscribers.
To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free website account and connect your subscription to it by clicking here.
If you are a digital subscriber with an active, online-only subscription then you already have an account here. Just reset your password if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
To the Editor:
These coops are all East River Coop members so it’s hard to understand how Dakota Energy’s high rates are East Rivers fault. Maybe we should have an independent financial audit comparing Dakota Energy’s costs with other East River member coop costs?
- What has Dakota Energy spent on this law suit? Legal fees with Schoenbeck Law firm, Lawrence and Schiller Marketing firm, and advertising costs?
- What costs are Guzman Energy paying for? The St. Lewis law firm?
- What did Dakota Energy’s letter of intent to Guzman Energy say?
Aren’t the members entitled to know?
Aren’t these fair questions?
Transparency is the best policy for a coop that is member owned.
Aren’t the members entitled to have a say, a vote on a matter that could fundamentally change the business model of our coop?
Let’s not hate each other because we are asking questions.
Pat Doak
Huron
25-year member of Dakota Energy
