Haeder's election; vote results on statewide issues
This item is available in full to subscribers.
To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free website account and connect your subscription to it by clicking here.
If you are a digital subscriber with an active, online-only subscription then you already have an account here. Just reset your password if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
SIOUX FALLS (AP) — South Dakota approved ballot questions Tuesday to stop out-of-state money flooding citizens’ initiative campaigns and to simplify future changes to the state constitution.
Meanwhile, the state’s voters rejected a pair of other measures to dramatically reshape the state’s ballot question system. They also tossed aside a tobacco tax hike that sparked major opposition spending from the tobacco industry.
Republican Dusty Johnson was elected South Dakota’s next U.S. representative, not to mention Republicans keeping control of every statewide office.
Here’s a look at races of interest beyond the governor’s race won by Republican Kristi Noem:
BALLOT QUESTION CHANGES
South Dakota, the first state to let citizens propose and pass laws way back in 1898, handed a win to those frustrated over money from outside the state’s borders influencing voter measures. Citizens also backed the Legislature’s plan to require constitutional amendments to stick to a single subject.
They were a pair of victories for House Speaker Mark Mickelson, who spearheaded both proposals after the 2016 election season brought 10 questions and millions of dollars from out-of-state groups.
Republican Dick Kelly, a 77-year-old former state lawmaker and local government official, voted for the outside funding ban, saying South Dakota has become a testing ground for people with a lot of money.
“I don’t think there should be that much influence by outside corporations or individuals with an agenda to come in and influence how we live in South Dakota,” Kelly said. “We don’t live the same way they live in California or New York, and I don’t want to live that way. I want to live our way.”